A Patient's Perspective
Up C Spine Home about up c spine a new approach evidence practitioners shop stop press contact us blog
Up C Spine - Is your Head on Straight?
Evidence Skull Base The Anatomy Of The Atlas Subluxation Cervical Spine Biomechanics Imaging And Radiographs The TMJ Link Research Library Scientific Studies Case Studies Anecdotal Newspaper Reports Book Reviews Other Papers Grostic Measurment & Analysis Upper Cervical Animations Anatomy Testimonials View Testimonials Submit Testimonials A Neck DotesTestimonial Links References Web Links Literature And Publications Video, Audio, Graphics & Animation Search The Internet Books of Interest My Viewpoint
Home | Evidence | Research Library


Category: Scientific Studies
Date 9-mar-2006
Title Clinical Efficacy of Upper Cervical Vs Full Spine Chiropractic Care on Children with Autism
Author Khaled A. Khorshid, DC, MS, MBBCh; Roy W. Sweat, DC; David A. Zemba, Jr., DC; Brett N. Zemba
Main Condition/ Disease  Autism
Source J. vertebral Subluxation Research March 2006
Abstract Background: Children with autism are presented with multiple categories of clinical pictures that affect their social, sensory, speech, and physical development. Parents of autistic children seek all possible therapies available including chiropractic. In this study, the clinical outcome of an upper cervical based chiropractic technique is compared to full spine adjustment in autistic children.

Methods: The clinical effects of full spine adjustment for 14 autistic children were evaluated using the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC). ATEC is a questionnaire about childrenís development and progress answered by parents. It was developed and is scored, online, by the Autism Research Institute of San Diego, CA. Seven of these children were randomly assigned to be shifted to Atlas Orthogonal upper cervical adjustment. The remaining seven children continued full spine adjustment. Repeated monthly clinical assessments were done for 3-5 months. Pre and post x-ray and leg length analysis was also monitored.

Results: The clinical improvement of the autistic children showed in the parentís observations through decrease of ATEC scores. This improvement of ATEC scores was seen in the cases of six of the seven children under upper cervical adjustment and in five of the seven children under full spine adjustment. The total ATEC average improvement in the upper cervical group was 32%, while only 8.3% in the full spine group. Two autistic children under the upper cervical adjustment protocol no longer met the criteria to be considered autistic following the interventions.

Summary Conclusion: In this study, the clinical outcome of chiropractic care showed higher efficacy with upper cervical adjustment when compared to full spine adjustment in autistic children. Further studies are recommended.
References See paper - Purchase at www.jvsr.com
Keywords Autism, chiropractic pediatrics, chiropractic, upper cervical

Select another document


Select another Category of Research Documents

Return to top of page
Site Map Disclaimer Credits Privacy